Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARA ROTTERDAM

IMO
9240471
Type
General cargo ship
Flag (estimated)
Gibraltar
Port of registry
Gibraltar
Technical efficiency
EIV 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
48.5
General cargo median 58.4 kg/nm (−17%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
23.4
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.9 (−6%)
Average speed
9.8 kn
General cargo median 9.7 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
11.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,041 t
CO₂ emitted
6,451 t
Distance sailed
42,059 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,309 h
180 days, 49% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 50.7 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−8%)
36.0Ranks 499 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)
8.2Faster than 52% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.5 (−24%)
11.3Ranks 301 of 1,167, lowest first48.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports53%
  • From the EU11%
  • Into the EU32%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
275 t
4.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ARA ROTTERDAM
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • ARA ROTTERDAM
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • ARA ROTTERDAM
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+1.9 kn+2%+25%−17%−13%1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.9 kn+2%−7%−38%−9%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,1033,49621,7652,01010.850.7––
2019not published1,2994,07926,1282,9488.949.7––
2018not published2,0416,45142,0594,3099.848.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published18.624.5−24%301 of 1,167VerifaviaB+C
2019not published21.325.0−15%399 of 1,154VerifaviaB+C
2018not published23.424.9−6%462 of 1,044VerifaviaB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.