Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

MANILA I

IMO: 9242326
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 36,271 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.13 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MTM MANILA, MANILA 1

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Kaizen Ship Management India Private Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 36,271 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

117.2 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.17

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+26%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,869 t

CO₂ emitted

9,029 t

9,169 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

24,475 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,188 h

91 days, 25% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 117.2 kg/nm · median 129.0 (−9%)

79.5Ranks 665 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.9 (+3%)

8.1Faster than 58% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+26%)

4.44Ranks 1,183 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU30%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU3%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,874 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MANILA I
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MANILA I
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MANILA I
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.9 kn	−20%	−4%	+1,289%	−19%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+7%	+1%	−82%	−17%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.1 kn	+35%	+12%	−24%	+41%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 35%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.5 kn	+17%	+34%	−23%	−42%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−27%	−24%	−37%	+54%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+20%	+24%	+46%	+43%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	Kaizen Ship Management India Private Limited	2,869	9,029	24,475	2,188	11.2	117.2	10.17	–
2023	not published	259	821	1,762	190	9.3	147.2	12.62	–
2022	not published	1,335	4,227	9,669	982	9.8	138.1	15.14	82%
2021	not published	1,306	4,110	12,770	1,072	11.9	102.3	10.71	77%
2020	not published	1,455	4,608	16,644	1,603	10.4	87.4	18.39	43%
2019	not published	3,177	9,994	26,422	2,654	10.0	120.3	11.94	84%
2018	not published	1,814	5,696	18,104	1,876	9.7	100.2	8.34	88%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Kaizen Ship Management India Private Limited	10.17	8.06	+26%	1,183 of 1,787	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	12.62	8.44	+50%	1,326 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.14	16.06	−6%	633 of 1,409	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2021	not published	10.71	16.69	−36%	236 of 1,343	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2020	not published	18.39	16.16	+14%	785 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2019	not published	11.94	17.32	−31%	306 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2018	not published	8.34	17.14	−51%	67 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.