Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SHOGUN

IMO: 9242443
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 35,106 t
Port of registry: Ravenna
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,106 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

96.3 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.1 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.60

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+2%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,980 t

CO₂ emitted

6,209 t

Distance sailed

20,567 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,927 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 96.3 kg/nm · median 129.1 (−25%)

80.4Ranks 372 of 1,797, lowest first192.7

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.0 (−3%)

8.1Faster than 41% of oil tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+2%)

4.78Ranks 922 of 1,797, lowest first25.50

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU10%
Into the EU79%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SHOGUN
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

SHOGUN
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SHOGUN
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	+1%	+2%	+11%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+3.4 kn	−12%	+30%	−2%	+11%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.0 kn	+13%	−21%	−37%	+9%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.2 kn	−22%	+31%	−4%	−17%	4.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−7%	−4%	−1%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	975	3,052	9,050	817	11.1	107.8	9.40	–
2023	not published	1,980	6,209	20,567	1,927	10.7	96.3	8.60	–
2022	not published	1,777	5,550	18,582	1,754	10.6	95.6	12.48	–
2021	not published	2,068	6,480	19,006	2,650	7.2	108.8	11.26	–
2020	not published	2,927	9,168	30,309	2,982	10.2	96.6	10.35	–
2019	not published	3,937	12,341	31,652	5,244	6.0	124.4	12.54	–
2018	not published	4,292	13,404	31,945	5,477	5.8	134.3	14.20	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	Mediterranea di Navigazione S.p.a	–	–	–	–	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	8.60	8.44	+2%	922 of 1,797	RINA	A
2022	not published	12.48	8.51	+47%	1,416 of 1,961	RINA	A
2021	not published	11.26	8.86	+27%	1,179 of 1,789	RINA	A
2020	not published	10.35	9.03	+15%	1,096 of 1,870	RINA	–
2019	not published	12.54	8.83	+42%	1,374 of 1,919	RINA	–
2018	not published	14.20	8.86	+60%	1,347 of 1,779	RINA	A+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.