Navalyze · Container · Ship

STAR COMET

IMO: 9242596
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 2,294 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: Saint-John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 33.36 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,608 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.8

Container median 178 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

85.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+348%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,296 t

CO₂ emitted

10,408 t

Distance sailed

46,558 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,694 h

154 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 65.4 kg/nm · median 167 (−61%)

78.9Ranks 59 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 13.5 (−29%)

9.6Faster than 10% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (+411%)

7.33Ranks 1,948 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports58%
From the EU17%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

409 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STAR COMET
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

STAR COMET
Container median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STAR COMET
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−2.0 kn	+10%	−8%	−24%	+10%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−16%	−23%	−12%	−5%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+7%	−2%	−25%	+33%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	+1%	+29%	+37%	+19%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−8%	+31%	+2%	−6%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.0 kn	−3%	+63%	+56%	−2%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	2,047	6,423	31,297	3,249	9.6	65.4	89.4	–
2023	not published	2,427	7,611	41,020	3,523	11.6	59.2	81.3	–
2022	not published	3,296	10,408	46,558	3,694	12.6	70.8	85.7	–
2021	not published	4,139	13,063	62,359	4,537	13.7	66.4	64.4	–
2020	not published	2,993	9,449	45,445	4,216	10.8	65.8	54.0	–
2019	not published	3,179	9,940	44,371	5,884	7.5	71.7	57.4	–
2018	not published	2,102	6,567	28,514	6,300	4.5	73.7	58.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	ADW 3. Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	89.4	17.5	+411%	1,948 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	81.3	19.4	+319%	1,882 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	85.7	19.1	+348%	1,805 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	64.4	17.9	+260%	1,706 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	54.0	17.6	+207%	1,626 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	57.4	18.9	+204%	1,629 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	58.5	20.2	+189%	1,567 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.