Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC AMY

IMO: 9242651
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 12,307 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,674 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

104

Container median 172 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

30.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+74%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,308 t

CO₂ emitted

22,976 t

Distance sailed

70,363 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,138 h

214 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−44%)

78.8Ranks 528 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+56%)

7.22Ranks 1,570 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU2%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,762 t

7.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC AMY
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC AMY
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC AMY
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−10%	−19%	−16%	−3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+8%	+16%	+5%	−7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−9%	−19%	−9%	−2%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.1 kn	−1%	+8%	+7%	+2%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+10%	+1%	−6%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	+27%	+32%	−7%	+27%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.2 kn	−13%	+4%	+14%	−17%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	5,710	17,898	57,326	4,755	12.1	99.6	25.4	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	7,534	23,782	67,850	5,090	13.3	111	26.1	–
2023	not published	6,609	20,690	64,337	5,202	12.4	103	28.1	–
2022	not published	8,026	25,042	71,029	5,134	13.8	113	28.7	–
2021	not published	7,568	23,612	66,395	5,248	12.7	114	28.1	–
2020	not published	7,308	22,976	70,363	5,138	13.7	104	30.6	–
2019	not published	6,218	19,607	76,013	5,752	13.2	81.8	24.2	–
2018	not published	6,299	19,864	66,794	6,085	11.0	94.3	29.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	25.4	16.3	+56%	1,570 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	26.1	17.5	+49%	1,362 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	28.1	19.4	+45%	1,303 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	28.7	19.1	+50%	1,267 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	28.1	17.9	+57%	1,254 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	30.6	17.6	+74%	1,346 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	24.2	18.9	+28%	1,100 of 1,788	DNV	–
2018	not published	29.2	20.2	+44%	1,154 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.