Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NAPOLES

IMO
9243423
Type
Ro-pax ship
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EEXI 25.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
207.6 kg/nm
Ro-pax median 150.2 kg/nm (+38%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
725
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 567 (+28%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
756
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+199%)
Average speed
11.7 kn
Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (−26%)
Fuel per day at sea
58.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,011 t
CO₂ emitted
31,235 t
31,862 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
48,234 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,110 h
171 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 207.6 kg/nm · median 150.2 (+38%)
69.3Ranks 342 of 408, lowest first232.4
Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 15.8 (−26%)
12.0Faster than 9% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 724.68 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 566.51 (+28%)
66.76Ranks 241 of 408, lowest first1,568.87
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 756.20 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253.18 (+199%)
48.59Ranks 310 of 408, lowest first1,247.19
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports1%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU45%
  • At berth in the EU6%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (16,730 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
6.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
5.5 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.020
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • NAPOLES
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • NAPOLES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • NAPOLES
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • NAPOLES
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+0.2 kn+2%+4%−4%−53%Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024+0.3 kn+21%+24%+10%+3%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−4.5 kn+6%−24%−39%−2%4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−1.5 kn+10%+1%+10%+65%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.3 kn−4%−2%−1%−26%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.1 kn−15%−15%+3%−87%Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.6 kn−3%−20%+13%+299%3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA10,01131,23548,2344,11011.7207.6––
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA10,17431,69950,1134,35511.5203.0––
2023not published7,66223,64245,5864,05511.2168.1––
2022not published11,86637,04874,9044,75715.7158.4––
2021not published9,83029,23268,0763,96817.2144.4––
2020LNGnot published10,38130,24569,0874,10016.9150.3––
2019not published11,81236,89766,8443,97316.8176.7––
2018not published10,75033,60359,1312,90020.4181.8––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA724.68566.51+28%241 of 408756.20253.18+199%RINAA+B
2024Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA1,549.34546.68+183%348 of 404778.86232.85+234%RINAA+B
2023not published1,498.16680.04+120%338 of 386617.32233.94+164%RINA–
2022not published1,529.63626.32+144%351 of 394881.60252.90+249%RINAB
2021not published927.03815.19+14%203 of 377265.04226.00+17%RINAB
2020LNGnot published1,248.20750.91+66%257 of 387432.40217.49+99%RINAB
2019not published9,539.38569.03+1,576%391 of 3949,539.38222.56+4,186%RINAB
2018not published2,388.87728.92+228%314 of 3612,389.08184.05+1,198%RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.