Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

NAPOLES

IMO: 9243423
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.61 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

150

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−4%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,248

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (+66%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

432

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+99%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,381 t

CO₂ emitted

30,245 t

Distance sailed

69,087 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,100 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 208 kg/nm · median 150 (+38%)

69.3Ranks 342 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 15.8 (−26%)

12.0Faster than 9% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 725 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+28%)

66.8Ranks 241 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 756 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+199%)

48.6Ranks 310 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports86%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU14%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4,310 t

14.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NAPOLES
Ro-pax median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAPOLES
Ro-pax median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

NAPOLES
Ro-pax median

0.02,5005,0007,50010,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

NAPOLES
Ro-pax median

0.02,5005,0007,50010,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	−4%	−53%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+21%	+24%	+10%	+3%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−4.5 kn	+6%	−24%	−39%	−2%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.5 kn	+10%	+1%	+10%	+65%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−4%	−2%	−1%	−26%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−15%	−15%	+3%	−87%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.6 kn	−3%	−20%	+13%	+299%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	10,011	31,235	48,234	4,110	11.7	208	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	10,174	31,699	50,113	4,355	11.5	203	–	–
2023	not published	7,662	23,642	45,586	4,055	11.2	168	–	–
2022	not published	11,866	37,048	74,904	4,757	15.7	158	–	–
2021	not published	9,830	29,232	68,076	3,968	17.2	144	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10,381	30,245	69,087	4,100	16.9	150	–	–
2019	not published	11,812	36,897	66,844	3,973	16.8	177	–	–
2018	not published	10,750	33,603	59,131	2,900	20.4	182	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	725	567	+28%	241 of 408	756	253	+199%	RINA	A+B
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	1,549	547	+183%	348 of 404	779	233	+234%	RINA	A+B
2023	not published	1,498	680	+120%	338 of 386	617	234	+164%	RINA	–
2022	not published	1,530	626	+144%	351 of 394	882	253	+249%	RINA	B
2021	not published	927	815	+14%	203 of 377	265	226	+17%	RINA	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	1,248	751	+66%	257 of 387	432	217	+99%	RINA	B
2019	not published	9,539	569	+1,576%	391 of 394	9,539	223	+4,186%	RINA	B
2018	not published	2,389	729	+228%	314 of 361	2,389	184	+1,198%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.