Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ARUSHI R.

IMO: 9244881
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 24,105 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.57 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,105 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

200.6 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+59%)

Average speed

14.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

69.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,946 t

CO₂ emitted

40,410 t

41,046 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

64,527 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,454 h

186 days, 51% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 200.6 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+13%)

78.8Ranks 1,278 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 13.3 (+9%)

9.1Faster than 69% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+59%)

7.22Ranks 1,588 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports8%
From the EU37%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (22,697 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.7 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC ARUSHI R.
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ARUSHI R.
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ARUSHI R.
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.8 kn	+3%	−2%	+41%	+17%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+4%	+12%	−4%	−7%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	−15%	−26%	−38%	−14%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	−13%	−19%	+22%	+19%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	+8%	+12%	−7%	−6%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.4 kn	−6%	−8%	+23%	−11%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.8 kn	+7%	+20%	−26%	−9%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	12,946	40,410	64,527	4,454	14.5	200.6	25.98	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	8,865	27,623	45,622	2,983	15.3	194.3	22.14	–
2023	not published	8,880	27,833	47,331	3,364	14.1	187.6	23.78	–
2022	not published	17,074	53,814	76,954	4,803	16.0	221.9	27.69	–
2021	not published	16,046	50,561	63,007	3,668	17.2	254.7	23.21	–
2020	not published	15,892	50,076	67,507	4,081	16.5	235.4	24.63	–
2019	not published	13,706	42,801	54,763	3,236	16.9	250.3	27.66	–
2018	not published	17,254	53,901	74,004	4,909	15.1	233.2	30.45	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	25.98	16.30	+59%	1,588 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	22.14	17.52	+26%	1,230 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	23.78	19.40	+23%	1,141 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	27.69	19.13	+45%	1,232 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	23.21	17.90	+30%	1,122 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	24.63	17.58	+40%	1,211 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	27.66	18.88	+47%	1,200 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	30.45	20.22	+51%	1,180 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.