Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC VAN GOGH

IMO: 9246566
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,444 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,444 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

72.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.05

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+158%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,287 t

CO₂ emitted

13,481 t

13,691 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

58,883 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,786 h

199 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 72.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 137 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 34% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.05 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+158%)

7.22Ranks 1,914 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports73%
From the EU10%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU8%

63% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (8,464 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WEC VAN GOGH
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC VAN GOGH
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC VAN GOGH
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−8%	−10%	+3%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−3%	+5%	−11%	−12%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+2%	+4%	+2%	+27%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.9 kn	+2%	−6%	+13%	+13%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−4%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−6%	−7%	+16%	−29%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−5%	−0%	−24%	+6%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	4,287	13,481	58,883	4,786	12.3	72.8	42.05	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,532	14,308	57,383	4,574	12.5	79.0	41.67	–
2023	not published	5,237	16,521	64,469	5,567	11.6	81.2	47.43	–
2022	not published	5,055	15,929	63,430	5,582	11.4	79.7	37.41	–
2021	not published	4,387	13,836	56,377	4,587	12.3	77.8	33.02	–
2020	not published	4,500	14,246	58,740	4,883	12.0	76.6	37.07	–
2019	not published	4,147	12,952	50,612	4,176	12.1	81.9	51.99	–
2018	not published	5,770	17,996	66,905	5,793	11.5	86.2	49.23	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	42.05	16.30	+158%	1,914 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	41.67	17.52	+138%	1,640 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	47.43	19.40	+144%	1,645 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	37.41	19.13	+96%	1,438 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	33.02	17.90	+84%	1,366 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	37.07	17.58	+111%	1,436 of 1,797	DNV	C
2019	not published	51.99	18.88	+175%	1,572 of 1,788	DNV	C
2018	not published	49.23	20.22	+143%	1,473 of 1,705	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.