Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CADIZ KNUTSEN

IMO: 9246578
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Knutsen OAS Shipping AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

303.0 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.78

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+122%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

99.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,401 t

CO₂ emitted

69,500 t

70,341 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

80,538 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,871 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 303.0 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+59%)

152.1Ranks 330 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.4 (−5%)

11.2Faster than 35% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.78 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+122%)

5.06Ranks 345 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU51%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (35,224 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.012

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+0%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	+93%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−1%	+11%	+51%	−4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	+1%	−18%	−7%	−41%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+1%	+9%	+11%	+45%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	+28%	+91%	−40%	+33%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−17%	−33%	+11%	−15%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	24,401	69,500	80,538	5,871	13.7	303.0	–	–
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	25,509	71,227	80,427	5,925	13.6	317.2	–	–
2023LNG	not published	14,144	39,243	41,651	3,074	13.5	339.6	–	–
2022LNG	not published	9,470	26,282	27,667	2,292	12.1	342.3	–	–
2021LNG	not published	10,068	28,786	29,747	2,008	14.8	338.4	–	–
2020LNG	not published	8,957	24,889	26,806	1,949	13.8	334.1	–	–
2019LNG	not published	11,741	33,002	44,920	4,870	9.2	261.4	–	–
2018LNG	not published	12,711	35,792	40,292	3,546	11.4	315.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	15.78	7.12	+122%	345 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	11.93	7.39	+61%	253 of 312	Lloyd's Register	–
2023LNG	not published	10.18	9.10	+12%	205 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2022LNG	not published	10.61	10.38	+2%	198 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021LNG	not published	17.99	10.46	+72%	250 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG	not published	12.38	10.71	+16%	180 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG	not published	9.32	10.87	−14%	75 of 248	Lloyd's Register	–
2018LNG	not published	10.92	10.92	+0%	99 of 197	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.