Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CADIZ KNUTSEN

IMO: 9246578
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Knutsen OAS Shipping AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

316

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

10.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+0%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−17%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,711 t

CO₂ emitted

35,792 t

Distance sailed

40,292 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,546 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 303 kg/nm · median 190 (+59%)

152Ranks 330 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 14.4 (−5%)

11.2Faster than 35% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+122%)

5.06Ranks 345 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU14%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

573 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

CADIZ KNUTSEN
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+0%	+32%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−7%	−6%	+93%	+17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−1%	+11%	+51%	−4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	+1%	−18%	−7%	−41%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	+1%	+9%	+11%	+45%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	+28%	+91%	−40%	+33%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−17%	−33%	+11%	−15%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	24,401	69,500	80,538	5,871	13.7	303	–	–
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	25,509	71,227	80,427	5,925	13.6	317	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	14,144	39,243	41,651	3,074	13.5	340	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,470	26,282	27,667	2,292	12.1	342	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,068	28,786	29,747	2,008	14.8	338	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	8,957	24,889	26,806	1,949	13.8	334	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11,741	33,002	44,920	4,870	9.2	261	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	12,711	35,792	40,292	3,546	11.4	316	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	15.8	7.12	+122%	345 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024LNG	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	11.9	7.39	+61%	253 of 312	Lloyd's Register	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	10.2	9.10	+12%	205 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10.6	10.4	+2%	198 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	18.0	10.5	+72%	250 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG / alt.	not published	12.4	10.7	+16%	180 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG / alt.	not published	9.32	10.9	−14%	75 of 248	Lloyd's Register	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	10.9	10.9	+0%	99 of 197	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.