Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SEAPEAK GALICIA

IMO
9247364
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.52 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG
Former names
GALICIA SPIRIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd · part of Seapeak

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
291
LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (−2%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
14.1
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+31%)
Average speed
13.3 kn
LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−10%)
Fuel per day at sea
93.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,782 t
CO₂ emitted
7,664 t
Distance sailed
9,555 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
716 h
30 days, 8% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 329 kg/nm · median 190 (+73%)
152Ranks 355 of 386, lowest first319
Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 14.4 (−17%)
11.2Faster than 13% of LNG carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.8 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+122%)
5.06Ranks 346 of 386, lowest first16.1
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU62%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
87 t
1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SEAPEAK GALICIA
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • SEAPEAK GALICIA
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • SEAPEAK GALICIA
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.3 kn+10%+36%+165%−13%2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2024−3.6 kn+3%−25%+65%+30%3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020+2.9 kn−29%−9%−34%+17%2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGSeapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd13,76138,31641,8413,47312.0329––
2024LNGSeapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd4,71812,97815,8021,6239.7299––
2020LNG / alt.not published2,7827,6649,55571613.3291––
2018LNG / alt.not published5,93116,65714,4351,39110.4411––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025LNGSeapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd15.87.12+122%346 of 386DNVA+C
2024LNGSeapeak Maritime (Glasgow) Ltd18.27.39+147%285 of 312DNVA+C
2020LNG / alt.not published14.110.7+31%204 of 267DNVA+C
2018LNG / alt.not published12.010.9+10%126 of 197DNVA+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.