Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Seapeakyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Seapeak | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 37 |
| CO₂ emitted | 1.2 Mt+3.5% |
| Fuel per mile | 230 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.8 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 1.7% |
| Ships burning LNG | 23 |
| Main segment | LNG carrier |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
LNG carrier
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1
- Seapeak9.1 (+27% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seapeak | 29 | 9.1 | +27% | 284 | 15.0 | 3,270 | 1.7% | 23 |
| Segment median | 7.1 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Seapeak33.7 (−5% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seapeak | 8 | 33.7 | −5% | 84 | 14.4 | 4,343 | 1.2% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seapeak | DNV (37) | 77% | 31% | 92% | 0% |
Seapeak: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEAPEAK GALICIALNG | 9247364 | LNG carrier | 15.8 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +123% | 12.0 | 38,316 t | €1.1m |
| AL DAAYENLNG | 9325702 | LNG carrier | 15.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +116% | 16.3 | 25,063 t | €662k |
| AL MARROUNA | 9325685 | LNG carrier | 15.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +111% | 15.3 | 25,346 t | €670k |
| GEORGIY USHAKOVLNG | 9750749 | LNG carrier | 10.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +50% | 16.1 | 67,841 t | €1.8m |
| NIKOLAY YEVGENOVLNG | 9750725 | LNG carrier | 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +48% | 15.3 | 77,074 t | €2.1m |
| VLADIMIR VORONINLNG | 9750737 | LNG carrier | 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +47% | 15.5 | 61,640 t | €1.6m |
| SEAPEAK MERIDIANLNG | 9369904 | LNG carrier | 10.4 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +47% | 13.2 | 23,450 t | €679k |
| YAKOV GAKKELLNG | 9750672 | LNG carrier | 10.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +44% | 15.3 | 85,300 t | €2.3m |
| RUDOLF SAMOYLOVICHLNG | 9750713 | LNG carrier | 10.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +42% | 15.6 | 65,545 t | €1.8m |
| EDUARD TOLLLNG | 9750696 | LNG carrier | 10.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +40% | 13.8 | 85,852 t | €2.3m |
| SEAPEAK ARWALNG | 9339260 | LNG carrier | 9.9 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +39% | 13.1 | 8,396 t | €223k |
| SOYOLNG | 9475208 | LNG carrier | 9.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +36% | 15.5 | 37,550 t | €1.0m |
| AL HUWAILA | 9360879 | LNG carrier | 9.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +33% | 15.5 | 51,646 t | €1.4m |
| SEAPEAK METHANELNG | 9336737 | LNG carrier | 9.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +28% | 12.7 | 14,372 t | €381k |
| AL KHUWAIR | 9360908 | LNG carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +26% | 14.9 | 47,323 t | €1.2m |
| LOBITOLNG | 9490961 | LNG carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +26% | 14.0 | 38,345 t | €1.0m |
| SEAPEAK MAGELLANLNG | 9342487 | LNG carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +23% | 16.2 | 38,026 t | €1.1m |
| AL KHARSAAH | 9360881 | LNG carrier | 8.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +22% | 14.9 | 45,390 t | €1.2m |
| AL SHAMAL | 9360893 | LNG carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +20% | 14.9 | 67,802 t | €1.8m |
| INEOS INDEPENDENCE | 9744960 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 38.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | +7% | 14.3 | 14,485 t | €384k |
| SEAPEAK MARIBLNG | 9336749 | LNG carrier | 7.6 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | +6% | 16.2 | 33,098 t | €888k |
| INEOS INSIGHT | 9685425 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 35.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | +1% | 15.2 | 14,490 t | €384k |
| INEOS INTREPID | 9685449 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 35.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | 0% | 14.1 | 13,867 t | €368k |
| SEAPEAK OAKLNG | 9681699 | LNG carrier | 7.1 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | 0% | 16.0 | 52,123 t | €1.4m |
| INEOS INTUITION | 9771523 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 34.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | −3% | 14.5 | 12,719 t | €337k |
| INEOS INSPIRATION | 9685451 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 33.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | −6% | 14.5 | 12,200 t | €323k |
| INEOS INGENUITY | 9685437 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 32.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | −9% | 14.5 | 18,308 t | €488k |
| INEOS INNOVATION | 9744958 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | −14% | 14.3 | 18,737 t | €525k |
| INEOS INVENTION | 9771511 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 30.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | −14% | 14.3 | 21,104 t | €560k |
| PAN EUROPELNG | 9750244 | LNG carrier | 5.7 g CO₂/m³·nm | 7.1 | −20% | 14.8 | 14,304 t | €381k |
30 of 39 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.