Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC DARDANELLES

IMO
9247754
Type
Container ship
Flag (estimated)
Cyprus
Port of registry
Limassol
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.10 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 54,280 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
244
Container median 174 kg/nm (+40%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
14.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−25%)
Average speed
16.1 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (+18%)
Fuel per day at sea
94.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
13,210 t
CO₂ emitted
41,397 t
Distance sailed
54,128 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,353 h
140 days, 38% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,788 container ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 244 kg/nm · median 174 (+40%)
82.1Ranks 1,227 of 1,788, lowest first309
Average speedThis ship 16.1 kn · median 13.7 (+18%)
8.6Faster than 85% of container ships16.5
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 18.9 (−25%)
7.86Ranks 574 of 1,788, lowest first55.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports32%
  • From the EU35%
  • Into the EU30%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,184 t
2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • MSC DARDANELLES
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MSC DARDANELLES
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2020→2021–––––
2019→2020–––––
2018→2019–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2021not published00–0––––
2020not published00–0––––
2019not published13,21041,39754,1283,35316.124414.1–
2018not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2021not published––––RINAA
2020not published––––RINAA
2019not published14.118.9−25%574 of 1,788RINAA
2018not published––––RINAA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.