Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM PUGET

IMO: 9248124
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 25,804 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.40 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,126 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

194

Container median 182 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+19%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

63.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,412 t

CO₂ emitted

44,997 t

Distance sailed

74,280 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,446 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 166 kg/nm · median 177 (−6%)

78.8Ranks 1,031 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 13.3 (−29%)

9.1Faster than 12% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+24%)

7.22Ranks 1,349 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU45%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,183 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM PUGET
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’212021’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM PUGET
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’212021’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM PUGET
Container median

16.018.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.6 kn	+8%	−8%	−38%	+3%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2024	−5.8 kn	+3%	−33%	+427%	–	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2021	+3.2 kn	−23%	−5%	−88%	–	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM SA	4,921	15,443	29,701	3,169	9.4	166	20.2	98%
2024	CMA CGM SA	7,364	22,950	48,027	4,351	11.0	153	19.6	98%
2021	not published	1,359	4,231	9,116	541	16.8	149	161	–
2018	not published	14,412	44,997	74,280	5,446	13.6	194	24.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM SA	20.2	16.3	+24%	1,349 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM SA	19.6	17.5	+12%	1,113 of 1,974	ABS	C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	24.1	20.2	+19%	1,014 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.