Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

SUAR VIGO

IMO: 9250000
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,240 t
Flag (estimated): Spain
Port of registry: Santa Cruz De Tenerife
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,765 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

116

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

206

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 104 (+99%)

Average speed

15.7 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

44.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,529 t

CO₂ emitted

23,492 t

Distance sailed

64,664 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,109 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 105 (+5%)

56.6Ranks 127 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 16.9 kn · median 14.4 (+17%)

10.9Faster than 89% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 277 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+191%)

47.4Ranks 208 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,388 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SUAR VIGO
Ro-ro median

100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUAR VIGO
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUAR VIGO
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+7.7 kn	+8%	+99%	+100%	+26%	7.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−6.1 kn	−8%	−45%	−26%	+9%	6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	+17%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	+6%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−7%	−4%	+36%	−25%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+13%	+8%	−36%	+24%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.2 kn	−6%	+2%	−3%	+2%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.	13,060	40,747	118,773	7,022	16.9	110	277	–
2024	FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.	6,023	18,847	59,390	6,461	9.2	101	220	–
2023	not published	8,914	27,794	80,652	5,261	15.3	111	201	–
2022	not published	8,371	26,123	68,674	4,510	15.2	122	195	–
2021	not published	7,529	23,492	64,664	4,109	15.7	116	206	–
2020	not published	5,942	18,550	47,373	3,120	15.2	125	274	–
2019	not published	8,139	25,382	73,660	4,627	15.9	111	221	–
2018	not published	8,901	27,753	75,951	5,180	14.7	117	217	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.	277	95.2	+191%	208 of 235	DNV	A
2024	FLOTA SUARDIAZ, S.L.	220	97.5	+125%	178 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	201	109	+85%	171 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	195	90.6	+115%	183 of 223	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	206	104	+99%	175 of 219	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	274	103	+167%	208 of 238	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	221	90.9	+143%	228 of 271	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	217	91.0	+139%	222 of 260	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.