Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

MERCHANT

IMO: 9250191
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): LNG or an alternative fuel (no methane data to tell them apart)

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

419

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

21.4

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+96%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−53%)

Fuel per day at sea

65.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,908 t

CO₂ emitted

11,555 t

Distance sailed

9,338 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,439 h

60 days, 16% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2022

Set against all 379 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 476 kg/nm · median 252 (+88%)

174Ranks 371 of 379, lowest first380

Average speedThis ship 14.5 kn · median 14.1 (+3%)

10.2Faster than 58% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 14.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.4 (+40%)

5.96Ranks 289 of 379, lowest first26.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU59%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

210 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MERCHANT
LNG carrier median

200.0400.0600.0800.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Average speed, kn

MERCHANT
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

MERCHANT
LNG carrier median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−3%	−11%	+12%	−42%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.8 kn	−34%	−13%	+100%	−19%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 34%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	+105%	+89%	−67%	+112%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 105%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+6.5 kn	−14%	+73%	+231%	−32%	6.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,943	32,276	23,007	1,590	14.5	476	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,026	29,221	20,467	1,292	15.8	490	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	7,569	20,877	10,231	854	12.0	740	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	11,174	30,859	30,945	2,377	13.0	361	–	–
2018	not published	3,908	11,555	9,338	1,439	6.5	419	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.5	10.4	+40%	289 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	25.1	10.5	+140%	269 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	30.8	10.7	+188%	261 of 267	DNV	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14.5	10.9	+34%	189 of 248	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	21.4	10.9	+96%	182 of 197	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.