Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

GOLAR ARCTIC

IMO: 9253105
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 11.50 g CO₂/t·nm

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

444

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

64.9

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+497%)

Average speed

5.7 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (−58%)

Fuel per day at sea

60.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,157 t

CO₂ emitted

56,687 t

Distance sailed

43,111 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,574 h

316 days, 86% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 248 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 444 kg/nm · median 308 (+44%)

206Ranks 238 of 248, lowest first418

Average speedThis ship 5.7 kn · median 13.5 (−58%)

10.6Faster than 0% of LNG carrier ships15.5

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 64.9 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 10.9 (+497%)

6.45Ranks 246 of 248, lowest first22.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU41%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

317 t

0.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	19,157	56,687	43,111	7,574	5.7	444	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	64.9	10.9	+497%	246 of 248	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.