Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

SHANDONG JUNIPER

IMO: 9253222
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.85 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel: Mostly LNG
Former names: GEMMATA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

291.8 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

–

g CO₂/m³·nm

Average speed

12.3 kn

Fuel per day at sea

86.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,121 t

CO₂ emitted

3,085 t

3,118 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,841 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

312 h

13 days, 4% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 282.0 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+22%)

166.5Ranks 235 of 355, lowest first358.9

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 14.2 (−21%)

10.7Faster than 13% of LNG carrier ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 21.50 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (+136%)

5.47Ranks 329 of 355, lowest first17.94

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,543 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

LNG engines slip unburnt methane

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.011

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

225.0250.0275.0300.0325.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

SHANDONG JUNIPER
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+3%	+14%	−90%	–	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+8%	−1%	+15%	+107%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−1%	−7%	−37%	−18%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+8%	+3%	+30%	+2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−10%	−7%	−22%	+19%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−6%	−6%	−13%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	1,121	3,085	3,841	312	12.3	291.8	–	–
2023LNG	not published	10,696	29,531	37,924	3,377	11.2	282.0	–	–
2022LNG	not published	8,623	23,776	32,907	2,688	12.2	262.1	–	54%
2021LNG	not published	13,912	38,568	52,473	4,034	13.0	265.1	–	47%
2020LNG	not published	9,919	27,426	40,236	2,959	13.6	246.5	–	54%
2019LNG	not published	14,214	39,716	51,818	3,952	13.1	274.3	–	67%
2018LNG	not published	17,446	49,253	59,516	4,548	13.1	293.1	–	51%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2023LNG	not published	21.50	9.10	+136%	329 of 355	Lloyd's Register	B
2022LNG	not published	10.39	10.38	+0%	191 of 379	Lloyd's Register	B
2021LNG	not published	12.71	10.46	+22%	195 of 289	Lloyd's Register	B
2020LNG	not published	12.51	10.71	+17%	181 of 267	Lloyd's Register	B
2019LNG	not published	10.50	10.87	−3%	118 of 248	Lloyd's Register	B
2018LNG	not published	13.53	10.92	+24%	147 of 197	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.