Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

ENERGOS PRINCESS

IMO: 9253715
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.58 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG
Former names: METHANE PRINCESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Energos Princess Corp

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

342

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+48%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.2

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+45%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

111.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,822 t

CO₂ emitted

33,470 t

Distance sailed

34,573 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,551 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 318 kg/nm · median 205 (+55%)

148Ranks 275 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.6 (+4%)

11.0Faster than 68% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+82%)

4.54Ranks 264 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

663 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ENERGOS PRINCESS
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ENERGOS PRINCESS
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

ENERGOS PRINCESS
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−7%	+4%	−68%	+2%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+5%	+18%	+19%	−11%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	−4%	−12%	+72%	+31%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.7 kn	+25%	+10%	+127%	+9%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 25%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	−5%	+8%	−79%	−29%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.7 kn	−40%	−16%	−24%	−21%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 40%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024LNG	Energos Princess Corp	3,559	9,841	11,206	738	15.2	318	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11,822	33,470	34,573	2,551	13.5	342	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	9,456	26,529	29,090	2,403	12.1	325	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5,740	15,983	16,900	1,280	13.2	340	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	2,027	5,580	7,446	498	14.9	272	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	9,947	27,706	34,865	2,633	13.2	285	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	21,614	60,355	45,754	4,815	9.5	472	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024LNG	Energos Princess Corp	13.5	7.39	+82%	264 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	13.2	9.10	+45%	285 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	14.9	10.4	+44%	295 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	11.4	10.5	+9%	166 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10.5	10.7	−2%	125 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14.7	10.9	+35%	192 of 248	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	18.7	10.9	+71%	177 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.