Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SEHNAZ KA

IMO
9255282
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
7,935 t
Flag (estimated)
Turkiye
Port of registry
İStanbul
Technical efficiency
EEXI 6.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA Super
Former names
FUTURA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Trans Ka Tanker Isletmeciligi Ticaret Ltd Sti.

?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,344 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
109
Oil tanker median 140 kg/nm (−22%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
30.7
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.86 (+246%)
Average speed
6.4 kn
Oil tanker median 9.8 kn (−35%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,668 t
CO₂ emitted
14,965 t
Distance sailed
43,025 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,674 h
278 days, 76% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,314 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.3 kg/nm · median 81.9 (−2%)
55.0Ranks 614 of 1,314, lowest first115
Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.2 (−3%)
9.1Faster than 40% of chemical tanker ships12.7
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.2 (+97%)
9.07Ranks 1,055 of 1,314, lowest first43.8
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports81%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU19%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,878 t
19.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • SEHNAZ KA
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • SEHNAZ KA
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • SEHNAZ KA
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2023+2.6 kn−7%+22%−11%+55%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−2.5 kn−3%−26%−90%−12%2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.2 kn−9%+2%−9%−19%1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+3.3 kn−10%+36%+10%−5%3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.1 kn+1%−1%−0%−0%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024part-yearTrans Ka Tanker Isletmeciligi Ticaret Ltd Sti.4981,5634,75943910.810535.3–
2023not published3039573,77134710.980.332.0–
2022not published3651,1504,2185088.386.520.7–
2021not published3,85912,37143,1904,01710.889.323.5–
2020not published4,65314,91847,2044,9149.698.629.1–
2019not published4,71415,11442,9046,7706.311030.5–
2018not published4,66814,96543,0256,6746.410930.7–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2024part-yearTrans Ka Tanker Isletmeciligi Ticaret Ltd Sti.––––Bureau VeritasA
2023not published32.016.2+97%1,055 of 1,314Bureau VeritasA
2022not published20.716.1+29%914 of 1,409Bureau VeritasA
2021not published23.58.86+165%1,580 of 1,789DNVB
2020not published29.19.03+222%1,719 of 1,870DNVB
2019not published30.58.83+246%1,794 of 1,919DNVC
2018not published30.78.86+246%1,667 of 1,779DNVC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.