Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SARA

IMO: 9259020
Type: General cargo ship
Flag (estimated): Palau
Port of registry: Malakal Harbor
Technical efficiency: EIV 17.07 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

30.7

General cargo median 57.7 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

33.0

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.0 (+32%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

General cargo median 9.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

8.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

322 t

CO₂ emitted

1,007 t

Distance sailed

10,471 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

948 h

40 days, 11% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,154 general cargo ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 30.7 kg/nm · median 57.7 (−47%)

38.5Ranks 31 of 1,154, lowest first93.7

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 9.7 (+13%)

6.2Faster than 71% of general cargo ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 33.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.0 (+32%)

11.2Ranks 827 of 1,154, lowest first55.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU48%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

85 t

8.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SARA
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019

Average speed, kn

SARA
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SARA
General cargo median

22.525.027.530.032.535.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2018→2019	+2.5 kn	−29%	−9%	+22%	−2%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	322	1,007	10,471	948	11.0	30.7	–	–
2018	not published	374	1,172	8,582	1,012	8.5	43.5	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	33.0	25.0	+32%	827 of 1,154	DNV	A
2018	not published	33.6	24.9	+35%	742 of 1,044	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.