Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TANGER

IMO
9259836
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
5,645 t
Flag (estimated)
Morocco
Port of registry
Casablanca
Technical efficiency
EIV 24.19 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,241 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
86.8
Container median 172 kg/nm (−50%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
37.9
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+115%)
Average speed
9.4 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (−33%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,582 t
CO₂ emitted
11,316 t
Distance sailed
41,253 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,405 h
184 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 93.6 kg/nm · median 178 (−47%)
77.9Ranks 378 of 1,825, lowest first314
Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 13.6 (−34%)
10.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.1 (+174%)
7.44Ranks 1,639 of 1,825, lowest first52.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports38%
  • From the EU26%
  • Into the EU32%
  • At berth in the EU4%
Fuel burned laden
3,582 t
100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
404 t
3.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • CMA CGM TANGER
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • CMA CGM TANGER
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • CMA CGM TANGER
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2021→2022−1.3 kn+6%−7%+22%−9%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.9 kn+1%+11%−11%+52%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.3 kn−13%+1%+119%−7%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.0 kn−17%−33%+294%−53%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2022not published4,20513,27944,9274,9869.093.652.497%
2021not published3,23410,20736,7523,57410.388.057.685%
2020not published3,58211,31641,2534,4059.486.837.9100%
2019not published1,8875,92618,8632,3398.110040.795%
2018not published5751,8014,78547510.112086.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published52.419.1+174%1,639 of 1,825ABSA
2021not published57.617.9+222%1,658 of 1,781ABSC
2020not published37.917.6+115%1,448 of 1,797ABSC
2019not published40.718.9+116%1,430 of 1,788ABSC
2018not published86.120.2+326%1,664 of 1,705ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.