Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

SICILIA

IMO: 9261542
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−17%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

585

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (−14%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

300

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (+28%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,956 t

CO₂ emitted

35,672 t

Distance sailed

93,866 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,506 h

229 days, 63% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 162 kg/nm · median 150 (+8%)

69.3Ranks 245 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 19.5 kn · median 15.8 (+23%)

12.0Faster than 80% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 99.6 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−82%)

66.8Ranks 73 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 104 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−59%)

48.6Ranks 95 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports93%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,365 t

6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SICILIA
Ro-pax median

120.0140.0160.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SICILIA
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

SICILIA
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,0008,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

SICILIA
Ro-pax median

0.05,00010,00015,00020,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+12%	+12%	+1%	−99%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.5 kn	+14%	+30%	+33%	+2,924%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−11%	−15%	+11%	−49%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+1%	−3%	−13%	+263%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−3%	−1%	+89%	−14%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−17%	−13%	−46%	−95%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	+12%	−4%	−3%	+39%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	20,388	63,557	125,786	6,463	19.5	162	–	–
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	18,047	53,264	124,545	6,387	19.5	145	–	–
2023	not published	11,956	35,672	93,866	5,506	17.0	127	–	–
2022	not published	12,105	37,746	84,383	4,753	17.8	144	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	13,799	40,634	97,129	5,244	18.5	142	–	–
2020	not published	7,541	22,747	51,516	2,840	18.1	146	–	–
2019	not published	16,778	52,492	95,337	5,478	17.4	176	–	–
2018	not published	15,436	48,202	98,625	4,846	20.4	157	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	99.6	567	−82%	73 of 408	104	253	−59%	RINA	A+B+C
2024	Balearia Eurolineas Maritimas SA	17,697	547	+3,137%	391 of 404	27.6	233	−88%	RINA	A+B+C
2023	not published	585	680	−14%	173 of 386	300	234	+28%	RINA	–
2022	not published	1,158	626	+85%	303 of 394	423	253	+67%	RINA	B
2021LNG / alt.	not published	318	815	−61%	120 of 377	211	226	−7%	RINA	B
2020	not published	372	751	−50%	127 of 387	220	217	+1%	RINA	B
2019	not published	6,874	569	+1,108%	386 of 394	6,874	223	+2,989%	RINA	B
2018	not published	4,957	729	+580%	345 of 361	4,958	184	+2,594%	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.