Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM FORT ST LOUIS

IMO: 9261889
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 15,565 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.50 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,774 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

139

Container median 174 kg/nm (−20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+46%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

47.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,511 t

CO₂ emitted

36,022 t

Distance sailed

82,979 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,865 h

244 days, 67% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 124 kg/nm · median 165 (−25%)

77.6Ranks 648 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 13.2 (−9%)

10.0Faster than 29% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 24.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (+28%)

7.34Ranks 1,179 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU30%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

11,062 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,405 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM FORT ST LOUIS
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM FORT ST LOUIS
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM FORT ST LOUIS
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+3.6 kn	−21%	+13%	−12%	−31%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.7 kn	+20%	−10%	+8%	−15%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.8 kn	+10%	+32%	+8%	+93%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−4.8 kn	−14%	−44%	−71%	−20%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	−11%	+2%	+9%	−30%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	3,047	9,505	24,565	2,040	12.0	124	24.9	95%
2022	not published	4,366	13,767	27,786	3,317	8.4	157	36.2	86%
2021	not published	3,379	10,655	25,741	2,314	11.1	131	42.6	99%
2020	not published	2,855	9,007	23,855	2,574	9.3	120	22.1	100%
2019	not published	11,511	36,022	82,979	5,865	14.1	139	27.5	96%
2018	not published	11,920	37,265	76,469	6,161	12.4	156	39.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	24.9	19.4	+28%	1,179 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	36.2	19.1	+89%	1,420 of 1,825	ABS	A
2021	not published	42.6	17.9	+138%	1,514 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	22.1	17.6	+26%	1,103 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	27.5	18.9	+46%	1,189 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	39.0	20.2	+93%	1,328 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.