Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

MINERAL CHINA

IMO: 9264790
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 89,606 t
Flag (estimated): South Korea
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.96 g CO₂/t·nm

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 89,606 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

134

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.69

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−44%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,304 t

CO₂ emitted

7,206 t

Distance sailed

17,148 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,700 h

71 days, 19% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2019

Set against all 3,360 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 134 kg/nm · median 91.2 (+47%)

67.0Ranks 3,017 of 3,360, lowest first135

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 10.3 (−2%)

7.4Faster than 45% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.69 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.38 (−44%)

4.89Ranks 289 of 3,360, lowest first15.5

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU19%
Into the EU79%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

114 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2019	not published	2,304	7,206	17,148	1,700	10.1	134	4.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2019	not published	4.69	8.38	−44%	289 of 3,360	Korean Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.