Navalyze · Container · Ship

MED TEKIRDAG

IMO: 9265598
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 7,887 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Tekirdag
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.64 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,475 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

84.6

Container median 174 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

40.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+116%)

Average speed

7.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−47%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,481 t

CO₂ emitted

4,619 t

Distance sailed

17,510 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,396 h

100 days, 27% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 128 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.3 kn · median 13.3 (−30%)

9.1Faster than 11% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+79%)

7.22Ranks 1,671 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU64%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

145 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MED TEKIRDAG
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MED TEKIRDAG
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MED TEKIRDAG
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−7%	−14%	+8%	+0%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−5%	−9%	+26%	−35%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−7%	−9%	−37%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.9 kn	+3%	+26%	+98%	+25%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	−0%	−13%	−49%	−19%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	+1%	+40%	+11%	−11%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.6 kn	−15%	−37%	+33%	−60%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,207	3,848	16,698	1,805	9.3	72.3	29.2	–
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	1,206	3,801	15,467	1,547	10.0	78.0	29.2	–
2023	not published	1,010	3,196	12,287	1,176	10.4	82.2	44.8	–
2022	not published	1,722	5,414	19,534	1,821	10.7	88.2	36.4	–
2021	not published	841	2,636	9,860	1,119	8.8	85.3	29.2	–
2020	not published	1,667	5,262	19,477	1,937	10.1	85.6	36.1	–
2019	not published	1,481	4,619	17,510	2,396	7.3	84.6	40.7	–
2018	not published	1,304	4,067	13,144	1,333	9.9	99.2	101	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	29.2	16.3	+79%	1,671 of 2,208	DNV	A+B
2024	MEDLOG SHIPPING S.A.	29.2	17.5	+67%	1,439 of 1,974	Lloyd's Register	B
2023	not published	44.8	19.4	+131%	1,614 of 1,899	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	36.4	19.1	+90%	1,424 of 1,825	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	29.2	17.9	+63%	1,282 of 1,781	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	36.1	17.6	+105%	1,420 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	40.7	18.9	+116%	1,432 of 1,788	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	101	20.2	+399%	1,690 of 1,705	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.