Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ANNETTE

IMO: 9266554
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 2,070 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. John'S
Technical efficiency: EIV 28.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SAL Heavy Lift GmbH & Co. KG · part of SAL Heavy Lift

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

80.3

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+46%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

45.5

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (+86%)

Average speed

16.3 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (+52%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,823 t

CO₂ emitted

11,997 t

Distance sailed

47,579 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,918 h

122 days, 33% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2024

Set against all 189 other ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 80.0 kg/nm · median 72.5 (+10%)

42.2Ranks 114 of 189, lowest first142

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 11.1 (+44%)

8.5Faster than 95% of other ships14.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 218 g CO₂/t·nm · median 51.6 (+322%)

21.3Ranks 162 of 189, lowest first306

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU31%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

337 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANNETTE
General cargo median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANNETTE
General cargo median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ANNETTE
General cargo median

0.050.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+2%	+6%	+25%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	+102%	+142%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	+10%	+15%	−51%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	+24%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+4%	−3%	−36%	−2%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	+3%	+13%	+137%	+2%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−3%	−10%	−53%	+20%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	SAL Heavy Lift GmbH & Co. KG	3,830	11,980	46,733	2,835	16.5	82.0	124	–
2024	SAL Heavy Lift GmbH & Co. KG	2,999	9,440	37,460	2,341	16.0	80.0	218	–
2023	not published	1,690	5,340	18,525	1,134	16.3	91.2	89.9	–
2022	not published	3,113	9,856	37,706	2,411	15.6	82.6	121	–
2021	not published	2,527	7,921	30,358	1,983	15.3	83.2	–	–
2020	not published	3,823	11,997	47,579	2,918	16.3	80.3	–	–
2019	not published	1,562	4,917	20,035	1,352	14.8	78.0	–	–
2018	not published	3,445	10,789	42,688	2,680	15.9	80.7	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SAL Heavy Lift GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	EnvService	B+C
2024	SAL Heavy Lift GmbH & Co. KG	218	51.6	+322%	162 of 189	EnvService	A
2023	not published	89.9	93.5	−4%	56 of 116	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	44.4	22.7	+96%	1,044 of 1,142	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	45.5	24.5	+86%	1,027 of 1,167	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	44.6	25.0	+79%	971 of 1,154	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	37.3	24.9	+50%	806 of 1,044	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.