Navalyze · Container · Ship

XIN QING DAO

IMO: 9270452
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 33,575 t
Flag (estimated): China
Port of registry: Shang Hai
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 50,550 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

238

Container median 178 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−23%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

81.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,908 t

CO₂ emitted

9,126 t

Distance sailed

12,248 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

856 h

36 days, 10% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,899 container ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 225 kg/nm · median 165 (+36%)

77.6Ranks 1,303 of 1,899, lowest first291

Average speedThis ship 15.4 kn · median 13.2 (+17%)

10.0Faster than 90% of container ships15.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.4 (+8%)

7.34Ranks 1,033 of 1,899, lowest first51.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU77%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

310 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

XIN QING DAO
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’222022’232023

Average speed, kn

XIN QING DAO
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’222022’232023

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

XIN QING DAO
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−5%	+2%	+18%	+42%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2023	not published	3,246	10,117	14,424	934	15.4	225	20.9	–
2022	not published	2,908	9,126	12,248	856	14.3	238	14.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2023	not published	20.9	19.4	+8%	1,033 of 1,899	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	14.7	19.1	−23%	679 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.