Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

XIN NING BO

IMO
9270464
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
49,025 t
Flag (estimated)
China
Port of registry
Shanghai
Technical efficiency
EIV 20.34 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 44,467 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
235
Container median 182 kg/nm (+29%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
16.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−18%)
Average speed
17.4 kn
Container median 13.8 kn (+26%)
Fuel per day at sea
98.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,236 t
CO₂ emitted
10,086 t
Distance sailed
13,763 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
789 h
33 days, 9% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,797 container ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 216 kg/nm · median 172 (+25%)
80.4Ranks 1,102 of 1,797, lowest first315
Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.0 (+14%)
10.4Faster than 82% of container ships16.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.6 (−22%)
7.14Ranks 640 of 1,797, lowest first52.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU18%
  • Into the EU72%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
281 t
2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • XIN NING BO
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • XIN NING BO
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • XIN NING BO
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2019→2020+0.4 kn−10%−7%−33%−18%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−1.8 kn+2%−9%−34%+1%1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2020not published1,2994,0496,02037616.021613.7–
2019not published2,1556,7269,02957915.623916.7–
2018not published3,23610,08613,76378917.423516.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2020not published13.717.6−22%640 of 1,797China Classification SocietyA
2019not published16.718.9−12%762 of 1,788China Classification SocietyA
2018not published16.520.2−18%643 of 1,705China Classification SocietyA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.