Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

VIRGO LEADER

IMO: 9273894
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 7,327 t
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,327 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

106.3 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.09

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−19%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

38.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,229 t

CO₂ emitted

6,927 t

7,036 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

20,968 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,378 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.3 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+6%)

79.6Ranks 350 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 73% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 45.09 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−19%)

34.70Ranks 161 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU21%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU4%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,036 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

VIRGO LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VIRGO LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VIRGO LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−7%	−15%	+80%	–	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+4.5 kn	+4%	+43%	+155%	–	4.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−8%	−15%	−82%	+85%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+14%	+5%	+117%	−22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	−5%	+17%	−8%	+54%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.3 kn	+10%	−14%	−43%	−68%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	−15%	−18%	−68%	+119%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,229	6,927	20,968	1,378	15.2	106.3	45.09	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,332	4,107	11,626	700	16.6	114.6	–	–
2023	not published	501	1,582	4,562	377	12.1	109.8	89.80	–
2022	not published	2,964	9,366	24,752	1,886	13.1	119.8	48.57	–
2021	not published	1,192	3,777	11,393	796	14.3	104.7	62.27	–
2020	not published	1,362	4,304	12,364	1,057	11.7	110.2	40.54	–
2019	not published	2,177	6,809	21,754	1,447	15.0	100.1	127.97	–
2018	not published	7,925	24,777	67,127	4,309	15.6	118.1	58.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	45.09	55.36	−19%	161 of 506	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	89.80	56.64	+59%	352 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	48.57	57.66	−16%	141 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	62.27	59.57	+5%	249 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	40.54	57.26	−29%	53 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	127.97	58.95	+117%	385 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	58.34	62.35	−6%	174 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.