Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

KOCATEPE

IMO
9274666
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
13,086 t
Flag (estimated)
Panama
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EIV 10.06 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC
Former names
FUREVIK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.

?
?

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,945 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
96.2
Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+7%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+10%)
Average speed
8.6 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−15%)
Fuel per day at sea
19.9 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,497 t
CO₂ emitted
17,149 t
Distance sailed
57,145 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,638 h
277 days, 76% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 150 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+88%)
52.8Ranks 1,447 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 2.6 kn · median 11.1 (−77%)
8.8Faster than 0% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 35.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+138%)
7.93Ranks 1,248 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports32%
  • From the EU25%
  • Into the EU33%
  • At berth in the EU11%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,866 t
10.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • KOCATEPE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • KOCATEPE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • KOCATEPE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−4.5 kn+9%−60%−72%+67%4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+2.5 kn+9%+72%+134%+31%2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.4 kn+0%+9%+237%–0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−6.1 kn+4%−58%−95%–6.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+0.2 kn−4%−2%−8%−2%Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+1.3 kn+26%+45%−26%+40%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.2 kn+4%+6%−9%−2%Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.5301,6583,5441,3552.615035.8–
2024BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.1,7325,45612,6321,7677.113721.4–
2023not published6762,1335,3951,1844.612516.317%
2022not published2006371,6003824.2125131–
2021not published4,25713,64835,2493,43510.312125.4–
2020not published4,84315,52638,4983,82010.112625.9–
2019not published5,16316,34751,7445,8908.899.818.5–
2018not published5,49717,14957,1456,6388.696.218.8–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.35.815.0+138%1,248 of 1,460Bureau VeritasB
2024BESIKTAS LIKID TASIMACILIK DENIZCILIK TICARET A.S.21.416.7+28%815 of 1,274Bureau VeritasB
2023not published16.316.2+1%660 of 1,314Bureau VeritasB
2022not published––––Bureau VeritasB
2021not published25.416.7+52%983 of 1,343Bureau VeritasB+C
2020not published25.916.2+60%988 of 1,312Bureau VeritasB+C
2019not published18.517.3+7%727 of 1,321Bureau VeritasB+C
2018not published18.817.1+10%741 of 1,294Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.