Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM PUERTO ANTIOQUIA

IMO: 9275050
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,828 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MAERSK NOTTINGHAM, BOMAR REGINA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMA CGM SA · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,828 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

86.8 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (−48%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (+165%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

26.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

558 t

CO₂ emitted

1,737 t

1,764 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

6,429 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

512 h

21 days, 6% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 86.8 kg/nm · median 167.2 (−48%)

78.9Ranks 347 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 13.5 (−7%)

9.6Faster than 35% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (+165%)

7.33Ranks 1,708 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU66%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU3%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (891 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CMA CGM PUERTO ANTIOQUIA
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM PUERTO ANTIOQUIA
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM PUERTO ANTIOQUIA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2022→2024	−2.3 kn	−9%	−23%	+18%	+69%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	−20%	−26%	−79%	−1%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+6%	+8%	−20%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	−7%	+6%	−48%	−17%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−8%	−6%	−25%	−3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	CMA CGM SA	558	1,737	6,429	512	12.6	86.8	46.36	97%
2022	not published	522	1,644	5,459	368	14.9	95.6	27.40	–
2021	not published	3,068	9,588	25,817	1,589	16.2	118.8	27.56	–
2020	not published	3,625	11,374	32,349	2,034	15.9	112.1	28.78	–
2019	not published	7,488	23,431	62,139	4,454	14.0	120.5	34.67	–
2018	not published	10,911	34,157	82,971	6,124	13.5	131.5	35.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMA CGM SA	46.36	17.52	+165%	1,708 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022	not published	27.40	19.13	+43%	1,228 of 1,825	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	27.56	17.90	+54%	1,241 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	28.78	17.58	+64%	1,317 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	34.67	18.88	+84%	1,345 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	35.80	20.22	+77%	1,269 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.