Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ANWAAR AFRIQYA

IMO: 9275268
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,679 t
Flag (estimated): Libya
Port of registry: Tripoli
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.88 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: General National Maritime Transport Company

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,656 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.2

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+205%)

Average speed

10.4 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,951 t

CO₂ emitted

6,088 t

Distance sailed

20,268 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,955 h

81 days, 22% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 138 kg/nm · median 129 (+7%)

76.1Ranks 1,002 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 3.7 kn · median 10.7 (−65%)

8.0Faster than 0% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 34.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+333%)

4.51Ranks 1,553 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

942 t

48% of all fuel; 52% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

517 t

8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANWAAR AFRIQYA
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANWAAR AFRIQYA
Oil tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANWAAR AFRIQYA
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+28%	+28%	−78%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−6.7 kn	+12%	−60%	−21%	+18%	6.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+4.4 kn	−23%	+34%	+79%	−15%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−6.0 kn	+27%	−36%	−24%	+29%	6.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+8%	+1%	−1%	+7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+7.0 kn	−24%	+67%	+3%	−30%	7.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.6 kn	+8%	−45%	−6%	+30%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	General National Maritime Transport Company	491	1,555	3,560	950	3.7	138	34.5	–
2024	General National Maritime Transport Company	1,724	5,396	16,000	4,280	3.7	108	30.4	95%
2023	not published	1,951	6,088	20,268	1,955	10.4	96.2	25.8	48%
2022	not published	1,409	4,399	11,346	1,891	6.0	124	30.4	52%
2021	not published	1,461	4,564	14,987	1,253	12.0	97.5	23.5	44%
2020	not published	1,365	4,268	15,131	1,183	12.8	90.2	22.1	44%
2019	not published	1,738	5,427	14,625	2,506	5.8	119	31.4	38%
2018	not published	1,717	5,366	15,540	1,365	11.4	111	24.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	General National Maritime Transport Company	34.5	7.95	+333%	1,553 of 1,665	Lloyd's Register	A
2024	General National Maritime Transport Company	30.4	8.06	+277%	1,657 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	25.8	8.44	+205%	1,621 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	30.4	8.51	+257%	1,830 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	23.5	8.86	+165%	1,580 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	22.1	9.03	+144%	1,616 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	31.4	8.83	+255%	1,800 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	24.2	8.86	+173%	1,605 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.