Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

LALLA FATMA N'SOUMER

IMO
9275347
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
32,540 t
Flag (estimated)
Bahamas
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EIV 11.19 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,938 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
336
Gas carrier (LPG) median 84.4 kg/nm (+298%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
44.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 46.9 (−6%)
Average speed
20.5 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 13.1 kn (+56%)
Fuel per day at sea
165.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
8,162 t
CO₂ emitted
22,552 t
Distance sailed
24,313 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,185 h
49 days, 14% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 302 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+270%)
49.8Ranks 353 of 355, lowest first124
Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 12.6 (−19%)
8.8Faster than 17% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.6 (−28%)
14.4Ranks 135 of 355, lowest first120
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU60%
  • Into the EU34%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
2,734 t
34% of all fuel; 67% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,459 t
6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • LALLA FATMA N'SOUMER
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • LALLA FATMA N'SOUMER
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • LALLA FATMA N'SOUMER
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−5.3 kn−2%−36%−15%−23%5.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+3.7 kn−26%−3%−24%−32%3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 26%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−3.2 kn−18%−36%+86%−60%3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−5.5 kn+52%+11%−55%+177%5.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 52%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+7.1 kn−21%+22%+121%+5%7.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+9.1 kn−4%+199%+17%+12%9.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−8.3 kn−22%−73%+5%−16%8.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA3,97410,97613,1811,29110.230225.653%
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA4,76813,14215,41899515.530933.347%
2023LNG / alt.not published8,49623,43620,3581,72311.841748.641%
2022LNG / alt.not published5,57316,10910,92372915.051012346%
2021LNG / alt.not published8,16222,55224,3131,18520.533644.334%
2020LNG / alt.not published4,64512,83810,98482213.442342.335%
2019LNG / alt.not published4,12211,4899,3552,1774.344137.765%
2018LNG / alt.not published5,01414,0298,88770612.656445.069%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA25.635.6−28%135 of 355Bureau VeritasB+C
2024LNGHYPROC SHIPPING COMPANY SPA33.335.8−7%145 of 306Bureau VeritasB
2023LNG / alt.not published48.641.8+16%185 of 330Bureau VeritasB+C
2022LNG / alt.not published12342.5+189%314 of 348Bureau VeritasB+C
2021LNG / alt.not published44.346.9−6%154 of 323Bureau VeritasB+C
2020LNG / alt.not published42.342.3+0%171 of 339Bureau VeritasB+C
2019LNG / alt.not published37.745.9−18%144 of 331Bureau VeritasB+C
2018LNG / alt.not published45.053.1−15%133 of 297Bureau VeritasB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.