Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COLOR FANTASY

IMO: 9278234
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Norway
Port of registry: Oslo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Color Line Marine AS

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+53%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

428

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (−41%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

116

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−37%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

106.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

32,334 t

CO₂ emitted

101,301 t

Distance sailed

133,102 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

7,272 h

303 days, 83% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 229 kg/nm · median 150 (+53%)

69.3Ranks 366 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 18.5 kn · median 15.8 (+17%)

12.0Faster than 74% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 463 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−18%)

66.8Ranks 184 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 46.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−82%)

48.6Ranks 39 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,806 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

COLOR FANTASY
Ro-pax median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

COLOR FANTASY
Ro-pax median

15.016.017.018.019.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

COLOR FANTASY
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

COLOR FANTASY
Ro-pax median

2004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	−1%	+0%	+3%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	−4%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+11%	+44%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	+68%	−50%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+0%	+0%	−8%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+0%	+1%	−41%	+83%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	−3%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Color Line Marine AS	29,734	93,060	129,637	6,991	18.5	229	–	–
2024	Color Line Marine AS	29,089	91,092	126,160	6,837	18.5	231	–	–
2023	not published	31,080	97,274	131,286	7,054	18.6	237	–	–
2022	not published	27,432	85,856	117,895	6,340	18.6	233	–	–
2021	not published	16,448	51,494	70,072	3,780	18.5	235	–	–
2020	not published	17,838	55,871	76,004	4,100	18.5	235	–	–
2019	not published	30,252	94,774	129,232	6,999	18.5	234	–	–
2018	not published	32,334	101,301	133,102	7,272	18.3	243	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Color Line Marine AS	463	567	−18%	184 of 408	46.2	253	−82%	DNV	B+C
2024	Color Line Marine AS	475	547	−13%	191 of 404	41.4	233	−82%	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	484	680	−29%	151 of 386	41.0	234	−82%	DNV	C
2022	not published	336	626	−46%	133 of 394	259	253	+2%	DNV	C
2021	not published	666	815	−18%	172 of 377	53.5	226	−76%	DNV	C
2020	not published	754	751	+0%	196 of 387	53.4	217	−75%	DNV	C
2019	not published	411	569	−28%	153 of 394	144	223	−35%	DNV	A
2018	not published	428	729	−41%	143 of 361	116	184	−37%	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.