Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VICTORIA I

IMO: 9281281
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Estonia
Port of registry: Tallinn
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.31 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HT Shipmanagement OU

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

245

Ro-pax median 155 kg/nm (+59%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

936

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 815 (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

879

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 226 (+289%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Ro-pax median 16.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,292 t

CO₂ emitted

23,245 t

Distance sailed

29,717 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,734 h

72 days, 20% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 180 kg/nm · median 150 (+20%)

69.3Ranks 291 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 15.8 (−16%)

12.0Faster than 22% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 49.7 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−91%)

66.8Ranks 24 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 915 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+262%)

48.6Ranks 339 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports46%
From the EU16%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU23%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5,311 t

22.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VICTORIA I
Ro-pax median

0.0250.0500.0750.01,0001,250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VICTORIA I
Ro-pax median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

VICTORIA I
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

VICTORIA I
Ro-pax median

0.02505007501,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	+4%	−0%	−23%	−89%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	−19%	−25%	+485%	−31%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−81%	−80%	+443%	+22%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 81%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.8 kn	+357%	+280%	−95%	−41%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 357%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.2 kn	+24%	+43%	−35%	+12%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+24%	+24%	−47%	+150%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−1%	−2%	−4%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	6,640	21,266	36,994	2,776	13.3	180	–	–
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	8,299	26,152	47,885	3,464	13.8	173	–	–
2023	not published	1,744	5,516	8,181	543	15.1	213	–	–
2022	not published	1,690	5,329	1,507	106	14.3	1,122	–	–
2021	not published	7,292	23,245	29,717	1,734	17.1	245	–	–
2020	not published	9,103	28,684	46,072	3,084	14.9	198	–	–
2019	not published	13,927	43,885	87,259	5,830	15.0	160	–	–
2018	not published	14,681	46,259	90,775	6,053	15.0	162	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	HT Shipmanagement OU	49.7	567	−91%	24 of 408	915	253	+262%	Verifavia	C
2024	HT Shipmanagement OU	458	547	−16%	188 of 404	123	233	−47%	Verifavia	C
2023	not published	666	680	−2%	191 of 386	136	234	−42%	Verifavia	C
2022	not published	548	626	−13%	183 of 394	69.2	253	−73%	Verifavia	C
2021	not published	936	815	+15%	206 of 377	879	226	+289%	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	834	751	+11%	204 of 387	57.6	217	−74%	Verifavia	C
2019	not published	334	569	−41%	133 of 394	55.0	223	−75%	Verifavia	C
2018	not published	333	729	−54%	121 of 361	52.2	184	−72%	Verifavia	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.