Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BUDDHA

IMO: 9283306
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 47,992 t
Port of registry: St.John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.38 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: VENICE A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: TMS Tankers Ltd. · part of TMS Group (Economou)

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 47,992 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

158.8 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 129.0 kg/nm (+23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.06 (+29%)

Average speed

11.0 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,998 t

CO₂ emitted

12,520 t

12,716 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,181 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,297 h

96 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 158.8 kg/nm · median 129.0 (+23%)

79.5Ranks 1,363 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.9 (+1%)

8.1Faster than 51% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+29%)

4.44Ranks 1,204 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU44%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU8%

8% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (940 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BUDDHA
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

BUDDHA
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BUDDHA
Oil tanker median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+10%	+6%	+28%	+13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	−14%	−18%	−21%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.3 kn	+7%	+20%	+196%	−20%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	+20%	+8%	−26%	−16%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	−12%	+46%	−27%	+19%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.4 kn	−23%	−3%	−31%	+14%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024part-year	TMS Tankers Ltd.	3,398	10,641	21,464	1,986	10.8	158.3	8.81	–
2024	SEASAILOR HOLDINGS LTD	3,998	12,520	25,181	2,297	11.0	158.8	10.36	–
2023	not published	2,852	8,915	19,670	1,735	11.3	145.0	9.19	55%
2022	not published	4,191	13,130	24,835	2,102	11.8	168.8	9.72	50%
2021	not published	1,327	4,171	8,383	798	10.5	158.3	12.17	–
2020	not published	1,495	4,685	11,325	973	11.6	132.0	14.54	–
2019	not published	2,313	7,261	15,452	2,197	7.0	149.7	12.19	–
2018	not published	4,342	13,647	22,281	3,978	5.6	194.9	10.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	TMS Tankers Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ABS	B
2024	SEASAILOR HOLDINGS LTD	10.36	8.06	+29%	1,204 of 1,787	Libero Hellenic Register	A
2023	not published	9.19	8.44	+9%	1,021 of 1,797	ABS	B
2022	not published	9.72	8.51	+14%	1,155 of 1,961	ABS	B
2021	not published	12.17	8.86	+37%	1,231 of 1,789	ABS	B
2020	not published	14.54	9.03	+61%	1,399 of 1,870	ABS	B
2019	not published	12.19	8.83	+38%	1,349 of 1,919	ABS	B
2018	not published	10.68	8.86	+21%	1,112 of 1,779	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.