Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

PHOENIX LEADER

IMO: 9283875
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 4,761 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Omuta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,047 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

63.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (+11%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,231 t

CO₂ emitted

10,198 t

Distance sailed

31,647 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,076 h

87 days, 24% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 109 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+9%)

79.6Ranks 383 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

12.0Faster than 42% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 71.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+30%)

34.7Ranks 334 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU39%
Into the EU58%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

263 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PHOENIX LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PHOENIX LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PHOENIX LEADER
Vehicle carrier median

40.050.060.070.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+7%	+9%	−58%	–	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−12%	−23%	+181%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	+13%	+16%	−76%	−27%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−8%	−7%	+96%	+34%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	+48%	−33%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−6%	−4%	−55%	+39%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	−8%	+6%	+202%	+11%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	982	3,095	9,049	645	14.0	109	71.9	–
2024Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,171	6,677	21,476	1,562	13.7	101	–	–
2023	not published	882	2,790	7,634	488	15.6	116	46.5	–
2022	not published	3,231	10,198	31,647	2,076	15.2	102	63.9	–
2021	not published	1,792	5,678	16,167	1,069	15.1	111	47.6	–
2020	not published	1,092	3,448	10,895	712	15.3	100	70.7	–
2019	not published	2,610	8,173	24,406	1,632	15.0	107	50.9	–
2018	not published	942	2,944	8,082	626	12.9	117	45.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	71.9	55.4	+30%	334 of 506	ClassNK	B+C
2024Bio blend	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	46.5	56.6	−18%	106 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	63.9	57.7	+11%	273 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	47.6	59.6	−20%	111 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	70.7	57.3	+23%	309 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	50.9	59.0	−14%	122 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	45.9	62.4	−26%	40 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.