Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

ALRAR

IMO: 9284013
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,990 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd · part of Norbulk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,990 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

117.8 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

53.17

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+50%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

184 t

CO₂ emitted

581 t

590 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

1,564 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

138 h

6 days, 2% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 117.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+45%)

49.8Ranks 304 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 12.6 (−10%)

8.8Faster than 31% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.17 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+50%)

14.36Ranks 231 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU70%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU7%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (310 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ALRAR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ALRAR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ALRAR
Gas carrier (LPG) median

0.020.040.060.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+11%	+9%	−26%	+362%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.5 kn	−7%	−23%	+87%	−48%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+6.6 kn	−19%	+52%	−93%	−33%	6.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−7.3 kn	−8%	−53%	+42%	+7%	7.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+8.1 kn	+3%	+131%	+91%	−49%	8.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	−27%	−26%	−22%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.3 kn	+33%	−1%	−44%	–	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 33%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	184	581	1,564	138	11.4	117.8	53.17	–
2024	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	226	712	2,120	184	11.5	106.5	11.52	–
2023	not published	130	412	1,136	81	14.0	114.5	22.06	–
2022	not published	2,339	7,400	16,456	2,215	7.4	142.2	33.07	–
2021	not published	1,785	5,652	11,572	788	14.7	154.3	30.80	–
2020	not published	903	2,853	6,058	917	6.6	149.1	59.94	–
2019	not published	1,600	5,039	7,809	1,213	6.4	205.0	48.54	–
2018	not published	2,135	6,706	13,870	1,601	8.7	154.0	60,415,693.69	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	53.17	35.56	+50%	231 of 355	Verifavia	A
2024	Norbulk Shipping UK Ltd	11.52	35.82	−68%	8 of 306	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	22.06	41.77	−47%	89 of 330	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	33.07	42.53	−22%	143 of 348	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	30.80	46.91	−34%	93 of 323	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	59.94	42.29	+42%	214 of 339	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	48.54	45.85	+6%	173 of 331	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.