Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Norbulkyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Norbulk | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 25 |
| CO₂ emitted | 92 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 76 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.6 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 7.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Norbulk36.7 (+144% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | 12 | 36.7 | +144% | 76 | 10.4 | 1,833 | 9.3% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Bulk carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9
- Norbulk9.0 (+14% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | 6 | 9.0 | +14% | 69 | 10.7 | 1,455 | 3.8% | – |
| Segment median | 7.9 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Norbulk27.9 (+71% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | 3 | 27.9 | +71% | 106 | 12.5 | 338 | 5.1% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Gas carrier (LPG)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6
- Norbulk35.9 (+1% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | 3 | 35.9 | +1% | 115 | 11.9 | 299 | 8.1% | – |
| Segment median | 35.6 | 0% |
Vehicle carrier
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4
- Norbulk123 (+122% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | 1 | 123 | +122% | 74 | 14.3 | 560 | 2.4% | – |
| Segment median | 55.4 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbulk | Verifavia (25) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Norbulk: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VESTHOLMEN | 9421295 | Chemical tanker | 37.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +74% | 9.4 | 289 t | €9k |
| REGGANE | 9176357 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 35.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 20.9 | +71% | 12.5 | 1,337 t | €38k |
| ACADIAN | 9298715 | Chemical tanker | 25.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +68% | 11.4 | 3,254 t | €142k |
| ALRAR | 9284013 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 53.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 35.4 | +50% | 11.4 | 581 t | €16k |
| EAST COAST | 9298703 | Chemical tanker | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +44% | 11.1 | 6,677 t | €237k |
| DESERT OAK | 9445667 | Chemical tanker | 54.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +38% | 11.1 | 148 t | €5k |
| RHOURD ENOUSS | 9284025 | Gas carrier (LPG) | 27.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 20.9 | +30% | 11.8 | 1,977 t | €56k |
| SLS AZURE | 9155377 | Container | 27.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +26% | 12.5 | 1,400 t | €39k |
| BRENTHOLMEN | 9436393 | Chemical tanker | 47.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +21% | 11.1 | 8,010 t | €265k |
| NEW ENGLAND | 9298727 | Chemical tanker | 18.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.2 | +19% | 11.3 | 2,060 t | €56k |
| FURUHOLMEN | 9553397 | Chemical tanker | 41.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +6% | 10.6 | 3,698 t | €99k |
| ASKHOLMEN | 9436381 | Chemical tanker | 39.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +1% | 10.0 | 7,628 t | €273k |
| SEASTAR VALIANT | 9462768 | Bulk carrier | 9.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | +1% | 10.1 | 4,286 t | €122k |
| KIRKEHOLMEN | 9553402 | Chemical tanker | 37.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −3% | 10.0 | 6,987 t | €241k |
| SEASTAR VICTORY | 9612246 | Bulk carrier | 9.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −6% | 10.7 | 3,203 t | €93k |
| RIVER OAK | 9438157 | Chemical tanker | 36.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −7% | 9.7 | 2,464 t | €80k |
| GULHOLMEN | 9435703 | Chemical tanker | 35.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −9% | 10.5 | 7,863 t | €230k |
| SEASTAR AVALON | 9755921 | Bulk carrier | 8.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −11% | 11.0 | 3,598 t | €112k |
| SEASTAR VIKING | 9690896 | Bulk carrier | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 9.5 | −12% | 11.5 | 1,974 t | €59k |
| GOLDEN OAK | 9445655 | Chemical tanker | 32.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −18% | 10.0 | 6,395 t | €204k |
| SEBRING | 9434321 | Vehicle carrier | 123 g CO₂/t·nm | 158 | −23% | 14.3 | 1,888 t | €70k |
| OCCITAN LISTRAC | 9549372 | Bulk carrier | 10.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 15.5 | −34% | 10.8 | 3,760 t | €117k |
30 of 25 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.