Navalyze

Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

MORNING CHAMPION

IMO
9285627
Type
Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried
7,360 t
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EEXI 14.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd. · part of Wilhelmsen Ship Management

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,360 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
101.7 kg/nm
Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+2%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
43.04
g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−22%)
Average speed
13.6 kn
Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−6%)
Fuel per day at sea
33.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
816 t
CO₂ emitted
2,541 t
2,581 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
8,022 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
588 h
25 days, 7% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 101.7 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+2%)
79.6Ranks 283 of 506, lowest first119.0
Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 14.4 (−6%)
12.0Faster than 34% of vehicle carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−22%)
34.70Ranks 135 of 506, lowest first158.48
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports7%
  • From the EU79%
  • Into the EU9%
  • At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,354 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MORNING CHAMPION
  • Vehicle carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MORNING CHAMPION
  • Vehicle carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MORNING CHAMPION
  • Vehicle carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−0.7 kn−3%−7%−68%−33%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.3 kn−4%−2%−28%+51%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.5 kn−15%−24%+78%−37%1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+3.5 kn−11%+15%+223%−68%3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−1.9 kn+20%+3%−90%+251%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020−0.9 kn−7%−13%+200%−18%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−0.9 kn−5%−11%−48%+38%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.8162,5418,02258813.6101.743.04–
2024part-yearWilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd2,6278,19825,1201,75814.3104.664.07–
2024Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.2,6278,19825,1201,75814.3104.664.07–
2023not published3,80012,00135,0242,49614.0108.542.35–
2022not published2,5327,93419,7161,26915.5128.466.99–
2021not published8812,8096,10150912.0144.4206.68–
2020not published7,59423,97762,8984,52813.9120.758.92–
2019not published2,7148,50620,9621,41614.8129.571.55–
2018not published5,53217,32540,3922,57315.7137.051.87–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmVehicle carrier medianvs Vehicle carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.43.0455.36−22%135 of 506DNVB+C
2024part-yearWilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd––––DNVB+C
2024Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.64.0755.31+16%204 of 335DNVB+C
2023not published42.3556.64−25%73 of 417DNVA+B
2022not published66.9957.66+16%296 of 463DNVA
2021not published206.6859.57+247%439 of 459DNVA
2020not published58.9257.26+3%238 of 449DNVA
2019not published71.5558.95+21%298 of 426DNVA
2018not published51.8762.35−17%97 of 434DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.