Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Wilhelmsen Ship Management
Ships27
CO₂ emitted381 kt+103.2%
Fuel per mile171 kg/nm
Average speed11.6 kn
CO₂ at berth13.4%
Ships burning LNG3
Main segmentCruise

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Cruise

CO₂ per transport work (pax) in g CO₂/pax·nm · segment median 521

  • Wilhelmsen Ship Management683 (+31%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wilhelmsen Ship Management9683+31%20412.82,87920.8%–
Segment median 5210%

Gas carrier (LPG)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 35.6

  • Wilhelmsen Ship Management12.7 (−64%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wilhelmsen Ship Management212.7−64%11714.24,2522.6%–
Segment median 35.60%

LNG carrier

CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 7.1

  • Wilhelmsen Ship Management41.0 (+476%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wilhelmsen Ship Management441.0+476%948.03,5318.7%3
Segment median 7.10%

Vehicle carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 55.4

  • Wilhelmsen Ship Management53.2 (−4%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wilhelmsen Ship Management753.2−4%10513.25066.2%–
Segment median 55.40%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Wilhelmsen Ship Management3.3 (−59%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Wilhelmsen Ship Management13.3−59%13911.48113.4%–
Segment median 7.90%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Wilhelmsen Ship ManagementDNV (27)37%67%96%0%

Wilhelmsen Ship Management: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
AVENIR ASCENSIONLNG9868974LNG carrier48.4 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+581%6.64,894 t€142k
AVENIR ASPIRATIONLNG9868962LNG carrier41.0 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1+476%7.05,709 t€300k
GPO EMERALD9760457Other91.6 g CO₂/t·nm35.3+159%10.415,784 t€448k
GPO AMETHYST9760433Other203 g CO₂/t·nm91.1+123%9.220,165 t€505k
GPO GRACE9760421Other69.3 g CO₂/t·nm35.3+96%10.123,858 t€664k
VIKING SEA9725421Cruise864 g CO₂/pax·nm521+66%12.826,963 t€1.2m
GPO SAPPHIRE9760445Other54.2 g CO₂/t·nm35.3+53%10.121,345 t€584k
MORNING COURIER9285639Vehicle carrier53.8 g CO₂/t·nm35.1+53%2.956 t€2k
VIKING VESTA9852444Cruise777 g CO₂/pax·nm521+49%13.019,408 t€927k
VIKING SATURN9845922Cruise736 g CO₂/pax·nm521+41%12.030,571 t€1.4m
VIKING VELA9852432Cruise711 g CO₂/pax·nm521+37%13.129,155 t€1.4m
VIKING SKY9650420Cruise683 g CO₂/pax·nm521+31%13.722,086 t€945k
VIKING STAR9650418Cruise677 g CO₂/pax·nm521+30%11.731,174 t€1.4m
VIKING JUPITER9796262Cruise676 g CO₂/pax·nm521+30%12.815,982 t€730k
VIKING MARS9833187Cruise650 g CO₂/pax·nm521+25%13.315,020 t€685k
VIKING NEPTUNE9845910Cruise642 g CO₂/pax·nm521+23%13.921,923 t€989k
MORNING CALM9285615Vehicle carrier68.0 g CO₂/t·nm55.4+23%11.22,456 t€94k
MORNING CAROL9336086Vehicle carrier50.5 g CO₂/t·nm43.7+16%14.63,960 t€127k
MORNING CHAMPION9285627Vehicle carrier43.0 g CO₂/t·nm43.7−1%13.62,541 t€71k
MORNING CELESTA9336062Vehicle carrier52.6 g CO₂/t·nm55.4−5%13.74,089 t€146k
NS DREAM9800506Gas carrier (LPG)17.3 g CO₂/t·nm20.9−17%14.236,602 t€997k
PACIFIC SUCCESSLNG9903425LNG carrier5.7 g CO₂/m³·nm7.1−20%15.611,422 t€303k
MORNING CROWN9285641Vehicle carrier55.3 g CO₂/t·nm76.1−27%8.8157 t€3k
MOUNT HUA9945655Bulk carrier3.3 g CO₂/t·nm4.8−32%11.44,013 t€109k
SAKURA GAS9629873Gas carrier (LPG)8.0 g CO₂/t·nm14.4−44%14.17,666 t€207k

30 of 27 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.