Navalyze

Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

MORNING COURIER

IMO
9285639
Type
Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried
10,483 t
Port of registry
Nassau
Technical efficiency
EEXI 14.20 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd. · part of Wilhelmsen Ship Management

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,483 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
175.8 kg/nm
Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (+76%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
53.75
g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−3%)
Average speed
2.9 kn
Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (−80%)
Fuel per day at sea
12.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
17 t
CO₂ emitted
56 t
57 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
99 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
34 h
1 days, 0% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 175.8 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+76%)
79.6Ranks 504 of 506, lowest first119.0
Average speedThis ship 2.9 kn · median 14.4 (−80%)
12.0Faster than 0% of vehicle carrier ships15.9
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 53.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−3%)
34.70Ranks 237 of 506, lowest first158.48
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU100%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (28 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.018
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MORNING COURIER
  • Vehicle carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • MORNING COURIER
  • Vehicle carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MORNING COURIER
  • Vehicle carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−10.9 kn+65%−66%−100%+32%10.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 65%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024−0.9 kn−17%−22%−21%−45%0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.2 kn−2%−3%+65%+17%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022−1.3 kn−7%−14%−56%+18%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021+1.5 kn+15%+26%+86%−19%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+0.5 kn−17%−14%−57%−4%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−2.6 kn−1%−16%+544%−39%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.175699342.9175.853.75–
2024part-yearWilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd1,7285,39916,0041,07414.9108.042.02–
2024Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.2,2547,03821,1661,53513.8106.540.63–
2023not published3,45210,91426,9221,83214.7128.273.64–
2022not published2,1316,76116,3411,09814.9130.463.12–
2021not published5,13516,21536,7922,27516.2139.653.45–
2020not published2,4147,62919,8081,34514.7121.966.01–
2019not published6,83921,44446,4023,27814.2147.468.85–
2018not published1,0683,3497,20542916.8148.2113.27–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmVehicle carrier medianvs Vehicle carrierRankVerifierMethods
2025Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.53.7555.36−3%237 of 506DNVB+C
2024part-yearWilhelmsen Ship Management (Korea) Ltd––––DNVB+C
2024Wilhelmsen Ship Management Sdn. Bhd.40.6355.31−27%56 of 335DNVB+C
2023not published73.6456.64+30%316 of 417DNVA+B
2022not published63.1257.66+9%270 of 463DNVA
2021not published53.4559.57−10%172 of 459DNVA
2020not published66.0157.26+15%286 of 449DNVA
2019not published68.8558.95+17%286 of 426DNVA
2018not published113.2762.35+82%363 of 434DNVA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.