Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC VANCOUVER

IMO: 9285691
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,319 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.56 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: E.R. VANCOUVER, 0086 E.R. VANCOUVER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,319 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

231.2 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (+38%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.94

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (−32%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

71.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,959 t

CO₂ emitted

9,218 t

9,364 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

12,800 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

992 h

41 days, 11% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 231.2 kg/nm · median 167.2 (+38%)

78.9Ranks 1,344 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 13.5 (−4%)

9.6Faster than 39% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.94 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (−32%)

7.33Ranks 598 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU46%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU2%

58% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,387 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC VANCOUVER
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−11%	−8%	−56%	−18%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−9%	−23%	−58%	−6%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−13%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.9 kn	+14%	+7%	+4%	+12%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	−16%	−8%	+105%	−0%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+3%	+9%	−39%	−11%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	2,959	9,218	12,800	992	12.9	231.2	11.94	–
2023	not published	7,618	24,037	29,217	2,360	12.4	260.8	14.49	–
2022	not published	19,747	62,286	69,054	4,719	14.6	286.0	15.46	–
2021	not published	23,236	73,272	79,418	5,382	14.8	292.6	15.96	–
2020	not published	19,596	61,345	76,050	4,846	15.7	257.7	14.28	–
2019	not published	11,324	35,399	37,061	2,582	14.4	305.5	14.35	–
2018	not published	17,995	56,410	60,948	4,474	13.6	295.2	16.04	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	11.94	17.52	−32%	598 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	14.49	19.40	−25%	708 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.46	19.13	−19%	735 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	15.96	17.90	−11%	777 of 1,781	DNV	C
2020	not published	14.28	17.58	−19%	688 of 1,797	Verifavia	B
2019	not published	14.35	18.88	−24%	601 of 1,788	Verifavia	B
2018	not published	16.04	20.22	−21%	609 of 1,705	Verifavia	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.