Navalyze · Container · Ship

SEASPAN OCEANIA

IMO: 9286009
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 72,262 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.14 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 56,466 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

295

Container median 174 kg/nm (+69%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−13%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

120.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

24,026 t

CO₂ emitted

75,250 t

Distance sailed

81,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,788 h

200 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 267 kg/nm · median 177 (+51%)

78.8Ranks 1,784 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 56% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 751 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports47%
From the EU26%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,311 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEASPAN OCEANIA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEASPAN OCEANIA
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEASPAN OCEANIA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+3%	−13%	−39%	+7%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.5 kn	+55%	+71%	+4,479%	+56%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 55%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2023	+1.2 kn	−35%	−29%	−94%	−57%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.4 kn	−13%	−30%	−52%	−0%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.1 kn	+18%	+34%	+229%	+24%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	16,983	53,079	63,541	4,628	13.7	267	11.6	–
2024	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	26,782	83,463	103,356	6,335	16.3	259	10.8	–
2023	not published	377	1,173	2,257	152	14.8	167	6.95	–
2020	not published	9,970	31,502	38,944	2,856	13.6	256	16.3	–
2019	not published	24,026	75,250	81,559	4,788	17.0	295	16.3	–
2018	not published	6,208	19,367	24,770	1,658	14.9	251	13.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	11.6	16.3	−29%	751 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.	10.8	17.5	−38%	509 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	6.95	19.4	−64%	152 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	16.3	17.6	−7%	810 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2019	not published	16.3	18.9	−13%	737 of 1,788	DNV	B+C
2018	not published	13.2	20.2	−35%	438 of 1,705	DNV	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.