Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC EVEREST VIII

IMO: 9286231
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,380 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CONTI EVEREST

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 57,186 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

270

Container median 174 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−22%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

100.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

19,487 t

CO₂ emitted

61,032 t

Distance sailed

72,112 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,663 h

194 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 243 kg/nm · median 177 (+37%)

78.8Ranks 1,592 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)

9.1Faster than 53% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−13%)

7.22Ranks 947 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports45%
From the EU26%
Into the EU25%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,319 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC EVEREST VIII
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC EVEREST VIII
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC EVEREST VIII
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	+3%	+12%	+1%	+11%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+6%	+2%	+134%	+0%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−31%	−25%	+57%	−9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−5.6 kn	−2%	−33%	−55%	−5%	5.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.0 kn	+32%	+59%	−46%	+27%	3.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 32%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−8%	−13%	−2%	−21%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.0 kn	−10%	−16%	+24%	−16%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	15,425	48,099	63,455	4,683	13.6	243	14.2	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	14,861	46,360	62,889	5,051	12.5	236	12.8	–
2023	not published	5,971	18,642	26,844	2,061	13.0	222	12.7	–
2022	not published	5,532	17,562	17,081	1,431	11.9	324	14.1	–
2021	not published	12,584	39,743	38,261	2,192	17.5	329	14.7	97%
2020	not published	17,723	55,972	70,963	4,902	14.5	250	11.6	–
2019	not published	19,487	61,032	72,112	4,663	15.5	270	14.8	–
2018	not published	17,550	54,840	58,382	3,543	16.5	301	17.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	14.2	16.3	−13%	947 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	12.8	17.5	−27%	663 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	12.7	19.4	−34%	585 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	14.1	19.1	−27%	631 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	14.7	17.9	−18%	696 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.6	17.6	−34%	483 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	14.8	18.9	−22%	645 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	17.7	20.2	−13%	709 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.