Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC GREENWICH

IMO: 9286267
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 79,231 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEAMAX GREENWICH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC Shipmanagement Ltd · part of MSC Group

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 63,400 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

235

Container median 165 kg/nm (+43%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−39%)

Average speed

13.4 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

75.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,688 t

CO₂ emitted

40,140 t

Distance sailed

53,929 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,015 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 246 kg/nm · median 177 (+39%)

78.8Ranks 1,614 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 6.0 kn · median 13.3 (−55%)

9.1Faster than 2% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.94 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−39%)

7.22Ranks 563 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU42%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,674 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC GREENWICH
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC GREENWICH
Container median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC GREENWICH
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−7.7 kn	−9%	−60%	−92%	+2%	7.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+14%	+16%	−55%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−11%	−18%	−7%	−22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−11%	−17%	+2%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−0%	+7%	+18%	−20%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−6%	−16%	+34%	+24%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.1 kn	+2%	+9%	−22%	−11%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	483	1,548	1,966	330	6.0	246	9.94	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	6,554	20,537	24,377	1,786	13.7	269	9.79	–
2023	not published	12,688	40,140	53,929	4,015	13.4	235	11.7	–
2022	not published	15,272	48,366	57,916	3,958	14.6	264	15.1	–
2021	not published	16,806	52,657	56,531	3,618	15.6	297	13.1	97%
2020	not published	14,304	44,703	48,098	3,298	14.6	297	16.5	100%
2019	not published	11,347	35,400	35,997	2,189	16.4	315	13.3	100%
2018	not published	14,364	44,818	46,294	3,017	15.3	310	15.0	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9.94	16.3	−39%	563 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	9.79	17.5	−44%	436 of 1,974	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	11.7	19.4	−39%	511 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	15.1	19.1	−21%	704 of 1,825	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.1	17.9	−27%	559 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	16.5	17.6	−6%	819 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	13.3	18.9	−30%	522 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	15.0	20.2	−26%	546 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.