Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

FLORENCIA

IMO: 9287584
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Palermo
Technical efficiency: EIV 19.73 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IC

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A · part of Grimaldi Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

154

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (−2%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

1,244

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (+99%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

66.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (−74%)

Average speed

18.7 kn

Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+17%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,874 t

CO₂ emitted

55,786 t

Distance sailed

116,212 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,222 h

259 days, 71% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 156 kg/nm · median 150 (+4%)

69.3Ranks 224 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 19.0 kn · median 15.8 (+20%)

12.0Faster than 76% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 1,398 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+147%)

66.8Ranks 357 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 83.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−67%)

48.6Ranks 76 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,640 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FLORENCIA
Ro-pax median

140.0150.0160.0170.0180.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FLORENCIA
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

FLORENCIA
Ro-pax median

50.0100150200250300

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

FLORENCIA
Ro-pax median

0.01,0002,0003,0004,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	−18%	−36%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	−1%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−7%	−3%	+12%	+7%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−0%	−8%	−14%	−49%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−3%	+6%	+68%	−33%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−11%	−14%	+76%	+224%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+7%	+5%	−26%	+145%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	16,394	51,163	105,093	5,543	19.0	156	–	–
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	18,790	58,635	128,394	6,669	19.3	146	–	–
2023	not published	18,671	58,248	130,210	6,688	19.5	143	–	–
2022	not published	17,874	55,786	116,212	6,222	18.7	154	–	–
2021	not published	20,774	64,812	134,472	6,684	20.1	155	–	–
2020	not published	12,718	39,752	80,176	4,348	18.4	159	–	–
2019	not published	8,107	25,527	45,434	2,379	19.1	178	–	–
2018	not published	10,201	32,128	61,072	3,152	19.4	167	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	1,398	567	+147%	357 of 408	83.8	253	−67%	RINA	A
2024	GRIMALDI EUROMED S.p.A	2,186	547	+300%	371 of 404	77.6	233	−67%	RINA	A
2023	not published	1,330	680	+96%	325 of 386	72.8	234	−69%	RINA	A
2022	not published	1,244	626	+99%	321 of 394	66.2	253	−74%	RINA	A
2021	not published	2,446	815	+200%	346 of 377	72.9	226	−68%	RINA	A
2020	not published	3,657	751	+387%	369 of 387	82.6	217	−62%	RINA	A
2019	not published	1,127	569	+98%	307 of 394	80.5	223	−64%	RINA	A
2018	not published	461	729	−37%	148 of 361	88.5	184	−52%	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.