Navalyze · Container · Ship

WEC VAN RUYSDAEL

IMO: 9287792
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,455 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.71 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: NEUBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,455 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

58.8 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−67%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.33

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+154%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,019 t

CO₂ emitted

9,453 t

9,602 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

51,338 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,412 h

184 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 58.8 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−67%)

78.8Ranks 33 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.33 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+154%)

7.22Ranks 1,903 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU26%
Into the EU13%
At berth in the EU6%

81% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,617 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

WEC VAN RUYSDAEL
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

WEC VAN RUYSDAEL
Container median

11.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

WEC VAN RUYSDAEL
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.5 kn	−17%	−20%	−26%	−24%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	+6%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	+1%	−6%	−11%	−2%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−0.7 kn	−6%	−11%	+6%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−8%	+1%	−4%	+8%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−5%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,019	9,453	51,338	4,412	11.6	58.8	41.33	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	4,884	15,369	69,058	5,701	12.1	70.7	54.50	–
2023	not published	4,793	15,014	65,423	5,316	12.3	73.3	54.78	–
2022	not published	5,330	16,812	73,504	5,554	13.2	72.5	55.94	–
2020	not published	5,370	16,950	69,514	5,010	13.9	77.2	56.79	–
2019	not published	6,033	19,004	72,208	5,687	12.7	83.5	52.40	–
2018	not published	6,573	20,662	76,319	5,902	12.9	86.1	53.70	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	41.33	16.30	+154%	1,903 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	54.50	17.52	+211%	1,816 of 1,974	DNV	C
2023	not published	54.78	19.40	+182%	1,738 of 1,899	DNV	C
2022	not published	55.94	19.13	+192%	1,677 of 1,825	DNV	C
2020	not published	56.79	17.58	+223%	1,657 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	52.40	18.88	+178%	1,577 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	53.70	20.22	+166%	1,529 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.